Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1188320110050010115
Gut and Liver
2011 Volume.5 No. 1 p.115 ~ p.116
Contrast Does Not Affect Cholangioscope Image Quality
Laczek Jeffrey

Flasar Mark
Goldberg Eric
Darwin Peter
Abstract
Background/Aims: Peroral cholangioscopy is a rapidly evolving technique that allows direct examination of the bile duct. We sought to determine if there was a difference in image quality with the cholangioscope immersed in normal saline compared with radiologic contrast or a mixture of contrast and normal saline.

Methods: Images were captured using the SpyGlass¢çcholangioscope system (Boston Scientific Corp.) immersed in solutions ranging from 0 to 100% contrast. The images were then reviewed in a blinded fashion by a panel of 9 endoscopists with experience using the SpyGlass¢çsystem. The reviewers scored the quality of each image based on a scale of 0 (extremely poor) to 10 (excellent).

Results: With the cholangioscope immersed in saline and 100% contrast, the mean image quality scores were 7.6 (95% confi dence interval [CI], 6.7-8.5) and 6.9 (95% CI, 5.8-8.0), respectively. The highest mean image quality score was 7.8 (95% CI, 6.7-8.9), obtained in 70% contrast. No signifi cant difference was noted in mean image quality scores using a one way analysis of variance technique (p=0.414).

Conclusions: Although there are limitations to ex vivo studies, we encourage endoscopists to use intraductal contrast prior to peroral cholangioscopy, if needed for lesion localization.
KEYWORD
Bile ducts, Endoscopes, Cho langiopancreatography, Endoscopic retrograde
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed